Search Maine Yellow Pages 
Log In | Register | Help

Food for Thought
John Golden has written about food for Gourmet, Food and Wine, the New York Times, New York Post, the Daily News and was an editor at Cuisine and publisher of Good Foods Magazine. He now lives in Portland, where he dines out, or searches the area's markets for the best foods to prepare himself.

Blog Index
December 13, 2005
An Odyssey of Portland Dining

So be it that the world is a small place and Portland a large one. Or so it would seem as the city looms tethered to an abundance of high caliber eateries co-mingling so closely in such a tiny locale one would almost think we lived in Metropolis.

Indeed, there’s no lack of variety among Portland restaurants--ensuring even the most peripatetic a sense of place. And that’s how it should be. After all, this is a city, such as it is, and diversity is key.

In larger communities new restaurants seem to pop up all the time. Here, of course, the rate is much slower. Ciaola’s is one example of the new kid in town to enter on all fours as an instant success. It’s not a hard formula. Offer good food and friendly service in nice surroundings and you can’t go wrong. Five Fifty-Five came in with a bang and continues flawlessly.

Do I dare, then, in the realm of the end of the year compilations offer my list of the best and the worst?

I’m certainly apt to offend some establishment, if I do, and what have I accomplished? Reviews or criticism shouldn’t be a dry Consumer’s Report of what’s good and what’s not. Still if the fare at a particular place is no better than the silt at the bottom of the sink then that shouldn’t be left unsaid.

No menu is 100 percent fabulous, at even the best places. There’s bound to be a clunker lurking. However, if the restaurant doesn’t alter it make you wonder.

Good waiters often ask at the end of the meal if everything was OK. Don’t refrain from saying something like, “Everything was great, but I didn’t like the soup.” The chef wants to know this.

Often I’ll read a restaurant review in other publications (I like to peruse reviews across the country—so easy to do online) and the place comes off well. Yet the reviewer gives it only a fair rating, and I try to understand why when most everything that was described sounded so good. I suppose one has to question the competence of the reviewer more than the talent of the chef.

In the end I’m not so sure that reading a moot appraisal of a particular dish means anything. I feel comfortable in knowing what the food is, with a cursory assessment (good, bad, heavenly or indifferent) rather than a proclamation.

Who’s the expert anyway? In this growing world of food criticism only a few ever qualified as divine authorities. The venerable Craig Claiborne was one and perhaps Gourmet’s Jay Jacobs anaother; his writing was often more delicious than the dish at hand.

I try to avoid this miasma of opinion by merely saying here’s what I had, here’s how I think it was made and here’s why I liked it or didn’t. I’ll spend a lot of time saying how I reacted to the overall ambiance, style and delivery at various places rather than linger over hapless opinions on the exalted being of a wild mushroom.

Ultimately what we all want to know is who’s the best and who’s the worst. It’s really a dreary pursuit yet one that seduces us all if only for quick amusement.

Yet there are places that truly excel consistently and places that truly disappoint constantly.

What I’ll do this year is—quite frankly—beg the question.

I’ve realized in the time that I’ve been contributing to this space that our metropolis is too small and too fragile to take swipes at those whose very existence could be affected. It’s better to omit than to commit.

Yet, there are times that I’ve lashed out because I’ve been so offended by what’s been served in front of me that I had to say something.

But mostly these have been places that are large, well established and quite frankly impervious to the verisimilitude of critique. They’re popular because the food is cheap, the portions are large and are known as fortresses of family dining instead of fine dining.

In the final analysis we’re lucky to have so many good restaurants that are so consistently up to snuff. They all have something different to offer even if some of the establishments are variations on each other.

What our local dining scene really lacks is a better pack of casual restaurants. We have a few. Norm’s, Dog Fish Café and Katahdin come to mind. Even the Salt Water Grill in South Portland makes the grade. They serve decent food in a very attractive waterfront setting. If only the interiors didn’t look like a cheap condo I’d go more often.

Where shall I begin?

A restaurant that seems to have rocked the boat lately is Oolong. Speak to 10 different people and you’ll get a variety of opinions. What Oolong is not is a Chinese restaurant. . Its métier is Asian fare, including Chinese selections, that go beyond the norm. It’s not a menu of column A or B. But in my mind they offer something totally different from any other establishment in town. The interiors are extremely well designed, the space is large and comfortable and even when it’s crowded you can get a table because there are so many of them.

I went there a few nights ago after having spent the day in Boston. I had a big lunch at No9 Park, always a special treat. Yet where to go for a good casual meal at home was a tough decision because such establishments of reputable standing are few and far between. Norm’s and Norm’s BBQ would have worked. But the former is impossible to get into and the latter is often just too noisy if you’re not in the mood for it.

Oolong was great. We ordered a few appetizers, two light entrees, a couple of beers and that was that. It was perfect.

Several nights later I went to Fore Street, which I hadn’t been to in a long time.

It was classic Fore Street. I love the space, the energy and the ambiance—all the more to appreciate the fineness of the food. Yet what makes it all so good? Ultimately it’s the quality of the ingredients that sparkle and the way in which they’re devised that marks Sam Hayward’s gracefully brilliant talent and wondrous results on the plate. From a wonderful puff pastry tart filled with caramelized cippolini onions to perfectly grilled fish and a steamed pumpkin pudding for dessert, it was all gloriously simple and divine. What more could one want?

Several nights later, on a Sunday, when very few of our better establishments are open, we went to Cinque Terre. I probably go there about once every other week, and each time it’s terrific.

I began with their roasted beet and goat cheese salad, which is united with just the right flavors in effortless proportion. For an entrée I ordered sautéed sole in a delicious sweet and sour sauce that seemed to linger dreamily. The various flavors of fine olive oil, judicious hits of herbs and spices, high quality ingredient, much of it organic and literally fresh off the farm--all deftly prepared—account for the sublime fare here. The restaurant is extremely comfortable, the lighting is just right, the tables are spacious and above all it’s one of the best venues for elegant Northern Italian cooking in New England.

The following week we went to Cialola’s with friends who hadn’t been before. Of course we entered a packed house of very happy looking patrons. It’s got to be the most convivial place in town. Good food and good Karma make it nearly perfect.

The other night we went to Five Fifty Five with a few friends. We had all been to a cocktail party--our hostess about to be newly single-- happily gave a splendid farewell fete to her matrimonial home. The hors d’oeuvres were wonderful and it seemed a shame to go to 555 on a full stomach.

What you can do here is eat lightly or go all the way and order a very fine meal indeed. I opted for a salad and a hamburger because I was literally stuffed from too many canapés and kickshaws. Others in our group dined very well on more rarefied choices.

The food at Five Fifty Five adheres to that wonderful concept of American bistro. There’s always something here that’s novel and delicious. That and an atmosphere that makes you feel like you really are having an evening out is a magical feat in itself.

Tonight, as we continue to make the rounds of Portland’s finest, we’re off to the Back Bay Grill. Tomorrow night we’re going to Hugo’s.

Perhaps it’s like taking the grand tour in two short days but that’s how it worked out. A friend of ours from Peaks asked to have dinner with us and to go somewhere “swell.”

“Where would that be?” I asked. She suggested Hugo’s. Quite frankly I haven’t been there in ages and I’m looking forward to it.

And it occurred to me that by going to Back Bay first, Portland’s longest running establishment of haute cuisine, followed by the stratospheric Hugo's might seem like nothing less than dining bravado beyond our reach.

To be continued.

Posted by John Golden at 04:36 PM

E-mail this entry to a friend

Comments

We haven't been to Back Bay or Hugo's yet, but they are definitely on our list. Saturday night we went out and had trouble deciding which of the many places that we haven't tried yet we would tackle. We decided on Street and Co. We enjoyed the atmosphere (to a limit), the wine list, and the appetizers, but both were really disappointed with the food. Some may disagree, but for me part of the purpose of going out is to get something better than you could've made yourself. I got blackened mako which was cooked correctly, but really had no taste, and the sides were just plain vegetables (the mashed potatoes were even a little dry, and lacked any interesting additions). My husband had a haddock dish; he wasn't pleased with it, but never went into details. I thought the atmosphere was charming and, in a sense, cozy, but I can't tell you how many times staff whacked into my chair (and I was pulled right up to the table). We had fun, but wasn't worth the $120 bill, in my opinion.
Looking forward to the continuation of this article!

Posted by Gretchen
December 13, 2005 04:54 PM

While I tend to agree on many of your restaurant choices, I'd stear others away from Hugo's. My fiance and I went not too long ago. Highly overrated. We're not huge eaters, but we both left hungry. Foam, in my opinion, is not a food. Guess we're just not into the nouveau cuisine...

For a better way to spend a few hundred dollars, head to Bandol instead. We had one our favorite meals of all time there on Saturday night and both felt it was worth the price. We were sad to see so few patrons--neither of us wants to lose this wonderful reataurant, though it's out of our price range for a standard dinner out!

Posted by Alisa
December 13, 2005 06:29 PM

I am surprised by Alisa's comments. I have always found the food at Hugo's to be incredible and the portions, while small, allowed you to really savor the tastes. Anytime that I have the need to celebrate and have the means - Hugo's is always my first choice. I have only heard marginal comments about Bandol and have had two separate people tell me the portions at Bandol were smaller than the ones at Hugos

The Boston Globe had an article on Portland in last Sunday's globe and called Bandol's food "laughable" and said they have "never paid more money for less food."

On the topic of casual restaurants I think John is right. As Alisa pointed out Bandol is empty most of the time and that is mostly because it is really a type of place that most of us can eat at infrequently. What Portland needs are places that you can afford to eat at regularly and provide decent food. Norm's is exceptionally successful at this and I am always am amazed that the only one who seems to try to replicate his formula is himself.

On that track, has anyone tried the new restaurant on Congress street a few blocks up from the eastern prom. I have walked by twice and both nights it was packed and one night the entire restaurant we giving the chef in the open kitchen a standing ovation. It looks nice inside but I have not seen a menu so I have no idea what the food or prices may be like

Posted by E. Johnson
December 14, 2005 09:15 AM

Question regarding E. Johnson's comment. Do you remember the name of the new restaurant? I passed by the other day quickly thinking it was the Blue Spoon that changed it's decor before realizing it must be a new place. I'm curious of the type of cuisine.

ACD

Posted by ACD
December 14, 2005 01:05 PM

The name of the restaurant is the Front Room and the chef hails from Back Bay Grill.

Posted by
December 14, 2005 03:32 PM

Actually, Harding Smith, owner and chef of The Front Room was most recently working at Back Bay Grill but he is most notably known as executive chef of Mim's for it's first year of operation. The menu at the Front Room (I've been twice) is not a far cry from Mim's but with Harding's personal touches on it instead of Natasha's touches. Chicken Liver Pate, Gnocchi with Crab, Steak with Blue Cheese, a la carte vegetables and starches,sandwiches and salads nearly identical to the Mim's menu and a VERY aggressive wine list.

Posted by Noreaster
December 14, 2005 04:45 PM

The Front Room is really nice. I loved the fact that you could just gets side dishes, in lieu of a full meal. I went there the other night and had a small dish of gnocchi, and sides of beets, brussel sprouts, and sunchokes. It was very good.

Does anyone out there have a good recommendation for vegetarians? I've never been too happy with the Pepper Club - we keep giving it another chance since it's supposed to be good, but each time have been disappointed. Thanks!

Posted by
December 14, 2005 07:10 PM

I love the vegetarian dishes at uffa! Plus, with it only being a third of the menu my friends have meat and fish dishes too.

Posted by
December 14, 2005 09:17 PM

john is right on about 555, i find hugo's sort of sterile...but john, as a rule...has the hammer out a bit too much and wields it a bit too recklessly....

Posted by peter
December 15, 2005 12:33 AM

Can I take a wild guess that your next report will be on The Front Room? Wow, has this place come out on fire. I have been there four times already and the only problem I have would be that it is already so busy and loud. What great food at very decent prices. And finally, a place that serves a wide variety of traditional favorites for breakfast. Please give it a bad review so it gets a little less busy. Thanks.

Posted by Dominic
December 19, 2005 10:39 PM

Actually had brunch there this past sunday and wasn't impressed. One issue was that 2 people called out, so they were understaffed, which led to a 20 minute wait for even a coffee order. Then the food was more than decent, except for scrambled eggs. Sausage and Biscuits? Wonderful! Homemade Corned Beef Hash? Better than Bintliffs! Scrambled Eggs? Ugh.
I think in a couple of weeks, we'll try it again. Hate catching a place for the first time, on an off day. But, I'd definately take it over the Blue Spoon, whose quality seems so hit and miss as of late.

Posted by S.
December 20, 2005 01:13 AM

I would love to hear some insight on what happened to Blue Spoon. I used to love the place and when I lived on the East End I would eat there regularly. Of late the food has not been as good as it used to be. The prices are still fantastic so I do not mind the simple fare - however the last time we ate there all the food was overcooked and some of it was cold. I don't mind eating there because you can still get a great deal for the price, I just wish they could bring back some of the care that was evident in their previous cooking

Posted by E. Johnson
December 20, 2005 10:28 AM

Regarding Fore Street. The last time I dined there, and it will be my last!, I was served a very tiny portion of swordfish (priced at 24.00) on a very large plate. If I wanted something additional to accompany that tiny little piece of fish, had to pay 12.00 for any side dishes. Even though the fish was tasty, I left there feeling hungry, frustrated and $140.00 poor. I remember dining at Sam's establishment in Brunswick (22 Lincoln) years ago, now back then he provided a great meal,very fair portions, great atmosphere, and all at a reasonable price. Why, back then he even included side dishes such as salad and veggies! Sam, please give us some sides and I'll return.

Posted by Royall
December 21, 2005 12:39 PM

The Front Room definitely has service problems. I ate there last night for dinner and was so disappointed. The food was GREAT, though. It took quite a while to be greeted by the server and by the time she came, we were ready to give our drink and dinner order. Okay, no biggie. The apps arrived and were very good, no problem. Then we waited, and waited and waited. 45 minutes between apps and entree, no offer for more drinks or anything, just an eventual "I'll check on your food". I wasn't even hungry anymore and took my entree to go, what a disappointment. I think she had so many "friends" visiting her that night that she never fired our entree course. I really really liked the food but was so bummed by the service. *sigh*

Posted by amelia
December 23, 2005 09:50 AM

Ate at the front room a couple of days ago, and was very much amazed: not by the food as much, but more by the hype everyone seems to be creating. Everyone knows the food was going to be okay, but with nice food comes decent service and esspecially qualified management. We observed neither, waiting forever on our food, watching the overbusy and clearly undertrained staff trying to work its way thorugh the messy place. Invest time in your staff! They represent the food.

Posted by Harry
December 27, 2005 01:57 PM

Does anyone have the phone number to the Front Room or Ciaola's or even a website address? I'd like to check them out for myself.
Thank you.

Posted by ACD
December 27, 2005 03:21 PM

I have been to most of the restaurants discussed here and, with the exception of Street and Co, which I found too noisy and crowded, liked them all. My favorite, however is Ribollita. We keep going back there and are never disappointed by the food or service. Do try the mussels appetizer and save some of the great bread for dipping into the sauce. The price is right, too.

Posted by Burns
February 27, 2006 04:27 PM

Maybe I got lucky... but I ate at the front room and my service was ok, no complaints. The food was by far the best I have had in Maine. In Boston for that meal I would have paid 40 a plate easy. I plan on eating there every visit to portland. Well, done.

Posted by
December 26, 2006 11:53 AM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?







Please enter the code as seen in the image above:



Blog Index
Updates
Sign up to be notified when there's a new entry
RSS
Subscribe
Archives
By category